In a surprising turn of events surrounding the high-profile case of Tory Lanez and Megan Thee Stallion, new witness accounts have emerged suggesting that Lanez may not have been the one who fired the gun during the incident that led to his conviction. This revelation comes amid reports of an altercation in prison that left Lanez injured, prompting discussions about his potential early release.
A bodyguard and driver for Kelsey Harris, identified as Bradley James, has come forward with claims that could significantly alter the narrative of the case. James stated that he overheard Harris admit to firing the weapon involved. According to his account, Harris fired the gun three times before Lanez, whose real name is Daystar Peterson, intervened by grabbing her arm, resulting in two additional shots being fired. James emphasized that Lanez never touched the gun or fired it, contradicting the charges that led to his conviction for shooting Megan Thee Stallion.
This testimony aligns with previous statements made by Shawn Kelly, the only non-party witness to testify during Lanez’s trial. Kelly indicated that he witnessed two women fighting and saw Lanez trying to break up the confrontation. He corroborated James’s claims about the shots coming from the passenger side, where Harris was seated. This information raises questions about the integrity of the original verdict and whether Lanez was wrongfully convicted.
As discussions regarding Lanez’s case intensify, speculation arises about whether he took the blame for actions he did not commit or if this is a strategic move to bolster his case for release. The renewed interest in the case comes at a precarious time, as Lanez was reportedly stabbed in prison, leading to concerns about his safety and well-being.
In an informal conversation captured on a recent podcast, Brick Baby, a fellow inmate, commented on Lanez’s situation and the challenges he faces in prison. He emphasized that Lanez must navigate the complex dynamics of prison life, particularly given his celebrity status. Brick urged Lanez to be cautious about forming relationships with others in prison, suggesting that his friendly demeanor could make him a target.
The juxtaposition of the new witness testimony and the recent stabbing incident adds layers of complexity to Lanez’s case. If Lanez were to be exonerated based on the new evidence, it could dramatically change the trajectory of his career, potentially reigniting his public image and music career. However, the validity of the new claims and their implications for his legal situation remain to be seen.
As the story continues to unfold, both Lanez’s supporters and critics will be closely watching the developments. The impact of these revelations could resonate far beyond the courtroom, influencing public perception and the broader discourse surrounding issues of accountability and justice in celebrity cases.